Current:Home > MarketsState asks judge to pause ruling that struck down North Dakota’s abortion ban-LoTradeCoin
State asks judge to pause ruling that struck down North Dakota’s abortion ban
View Date:2024-12-23 21:29:17
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — The state of North Dakota is asking a judge to pause his ruling from last week that struck down the state’s abortion ban until the state Supreme Court rules on a planned appeal.
The state’s motion to stay a pending appeal was filed Wednesday. State District Judge Bruce Romanick ruled last week that North Dakota’s abortion ban “is unconstitutionally void for vagueness,” and that pregnant women in the state have a fundamental right to abortion before viability under the state constitution.
Attorneys for the state said “a stay is warranted until a decision and mandate has been issued by the North Dakota Supreme Court from the appeal that the State will be promptly pursuing. Simply, this case presents serious, difficult and new legal issues.”
In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which established a constitutional right to an abortion. Soon afterward, the only abortion clinic in North Dakota moved from Fargo to neighboring Moorhead, Minnesota, and challenged North Dakota’s since-repealed trigger ban outlawing most abortions.
In 2023, North Dakota’s Republican-controlled Legislature revised the state’s abortion laws amid the ongoing lawsuit. The amended ban outlawed performance of all abortions as a felony crime but for procedures to prevent a pregnant woman’s death or a “serious health risk” to her, and in cases of rape or incest but only up to six weeks. The law took effect in April 2023.
The Red River Women’s Clinic, joined by several doctors, then challenged that law as unconstitutionally vague for doctors and its health exception as too narrow. In court in July, about a month before a scheduled trial, the state asked the judge to throw out the lawsuit, while the plaintiffs asked him to let the August trial proceed. He canceled the trial and later found the law unconstitutional, but has yet to issue a final judgment.
In an interview Tuesday, Center for Reproductive Rights Senior Counsel Marc Hearron said the plaintiffs would oppose any stay.
“Look, they don’t have to appeal, and they also don’t have to seek a stay because, like I said, this decision is not leading any time soon to clinics reopening across the state,” he said. “We’re talking about standard-of-care, necessary, time-sensitive health care, abortion care generally provided in hospitals or by maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and for the state to seek a stay or to appeal a ruling that allows those physicians just to practice medicine I think is shameful.”
Republican state Sen. Janne Myrdal, who introduced the 2023 bill, said she’s confident the state Supreme Court will overturn the judge’s ruling. She called the decision one of the poorest legal decisions she has read.
“I challenge anybody to go through his opinion and find anything but ‘personal opinions,’” she said Monday.
In his ruling, Romanick said, “The Court is left to craft findings and conclusions on an issue of vital public importance when the longstanding precedent on that issue no longer exists federally, and much of the North Dakota precedent on that issue relied on the federal precedent now upended — with relatively no idea how the appellate court in this state will address the issue.”
veryGood! (99)
Related
- Are Ciara Ready and Russell Wilson Ready For Another Baby? She Says…
- Jack Hanna's family opens up about his Alzheimer's diagnosis, saying he doesn't know most of his family
- Why Jana Kramer's Relationship With Coach Allan Russell Is Different From Her Past Ones
- Rust armorer facing an additional evidence tampering count in fatal on-set shooting
- LSU student arrested over threats to governor who wanted a tiger at college football games
- Another $1.2 Billion Substation? No Thanks, Says Utility, We’ll Find a Better Way
- Bella Thorne Is Engaged to Producer Mark Emms
- Swimmers should get ready for another summer short on lifeguards
- AI could help scale humanitarian responses. But it could also have big downsides
- What to know about the 5 passengers who were on the Titanic sub
Ranking
- DWTS' Sasha Farber Claps Back at Diss From Jenn Tran's Ex Devin Strader
- Keystone XL Pipeline Ruling: Trump Administration Must Release Documents
- Connecticut Program Makes Solar Affordable for Low-Income Families
- Why Jana Kramer's Relationship With Coach Allan Russell Is Different From Her Past Ones
- Man Found Dead in Tanning Bed at Planet Fitness Gym After 3 Days
- Taylor Swift and Ice Spice's Karma Remix Is Here and It's Sweet Like Honey
- Teen volleyball player who lost her legs in violent car crash sues city of St. Louis and 2 drivers involved
- Senate 2020: In Storm-Torn North Carolina, an Embattled Republican Tries a Climate-Friendly Image
Recommendation
-
John Robinson, former USC Trojans and Los Angeles Rams coach, dies at 89
-
By Getting Microgrids to ‘Talk,’ Energy Prize Winners Tackle the Future of Power
-
Sharon Stone Serves Up Sliver of Summer in Fierce Bikini Photo
-
Roll Call: Here's What Bama Rush's Sorority Pledges Are Up to Now
-
NFL Week 10 winners, losers: Cowboys' season can no longer be saved
-
What to know about the 5 passengers who were on the Titanic sub
-
Senate 2020: With Record Heat, Climate is a Big Deal in Arizona, but It May Not Sway Voters
-
Taylor Swift and Ice Spice's Karma Remix Is Here and It's Sweet Like Honey