Current:Home > BackHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases-LoTradeCoin
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View Date:2024-12-24 00:10:15
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (58493)
Related
- Patricia Heaton criticizes media, 'extremists' she says 'fear-mongered' in 2024 election
- ‘The Exorcist: Believer’ takes possession of box office with $27.2 million opening
- California governor vetoes magic mushroom and caste discrimination bills
- Trump discussed nuclear submarines with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt, three sources say
- Burger King is giving away a million Whoppers for $1: Here's how to get one
- RFK Jr. is expected to drop his Democratic primary bid and launch an independent or third-party run
- What was the Yom Kippur War? Why Saturday surprise attack on Israel is reminiscent of 1973
- Two Husky puppies thrown over a Michigan animal shelter's fence get adopted
- Family of security guard shot and killed at Portland, Oregon, hospital sues facility for $35M
- Jobs report shows payrolls grew by 336K jobs in September while unemployment held at 3.8%
Ranking
- NYC bans unusual practice of forcing tenants to pay real estate brokers hired by landlords
- 150-year-old Florida Keys lighthouse illuminated for first time in a decade
- Hamas attack at music festival led to chaos and frantic attempts to escape or hide
- Oklahoma is among teams moving up in top 10, while Texas tumbles in US LBM Coaches Poll
- Indiana in the top five of the College Football Playoff rankings? You've got to be kidding
- Fantasy football rankings for Week 5: Bye week blues begin
- Bills LB Matt Milano sustains knee injury in 1st-quarter pileup, won’t return vs Jaguars
- Detroit Lions LB Alex Anzalone reveals his parents are trying to evacuate Israel amidst war
Recommendation
-
Driver dies after crashing on hurricane-damaged highway in North Carolina
-
Coast Guard: 3 rescued from capsized vessel off New Jersey coast
-
John Cena: Last WWE match 'is on the horizon;' end of SAG-AFTRA strike would pull him away
-
College football Week 6 grades: We're all laughing at Miami after the worst loss of year
-
Stop smartphone distractions by creating a focus mode: Video tutorial
-
In tight elections, Prime Minister Xavier Bettel seeks a new term to head Luxembourg
-
College football Week 6 grades: We're all laughing at Miami after the worst loss of year
-
Clergy burnout is a growing concern in polarized churches. A summit offers coping strategies