Current:Home > MarketsWisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid-LoTradeCoin
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
View Date:2024-12-23 11:09:53
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday on whether a law that legislators adopted more than a decade before the Civil War bans abortion and can still be enforced.
Abortion-rights advocates stand an excellent chance of prevailing, given that liberal justices control the court and one of them remarked on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Monday’s arguments are little more than a formality ahead of a ruling, which is expected to take weeks.
Wisconsin lawmakers passed the state’s first prohibition on abortion in 1849. That law stated that anyone who killed a fetus unless the act was to save the mother’s life was guilty of manslaughter. Legislators passed statutes about a decade later that prohibited a woman from attempting to obtain her own miscarriage. In the 1950s, lawmakers revised the law’s language to make killing an unborn child or killing the mother with the intent of destroying her unborn child a felony. The revisions allowed a doctor in consultation with two other physicians to perform an abortion to save the mother’s life.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion nationwide nullified the Wisconsin ban, but legislators never repealed it. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe two years ago, conservatives argued that the Wisconsin ban was enforceable again.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2022. He argued that a 1985 Wisconsin law that allows abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb supersedes the ban. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, argues the 1849 ban should be enforceable. He contends that it was never repealed and that it can co-exist with the 1985 law because that law didn’t legalize abortion at any point. Other modern-day abortion restrictions also don’t legalize the practice, he argues.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled last year that the old ban outlaws feticide — which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent — but not consensual abortions. The ruling emboldened Planned Parenthood to resume offering abortions in Wisconsin after halting procedures after Roe was overturned.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court in February to overturn Schlipper’s ruling without waiting for lower appellate courts to rule first. The court agreed to take the case in July.
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin filed a separate lawsuit in February asking the state Supreme Court to rule directly on whether a constitutional right to abortion exists in the state. The court agreed in July to take that case as well. The justices have yet to schedule oral arguments.
Persuading the court’s liberal majority to uphold the ban appears next to impossible. Liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz stated openly during her campaign that she supports abortion rights, a major departure for a judicial candidate. Usually, such candidates refrain from speaking about their personal views to avoid the appearance of bias.
The court’s three conservative justices have accused the liberals of playing politics with abortion.
veryGood! (37)
Related
- Horoscopes Today, November 12, 2024
- After lots of interest in USWNT job, US Soccer zeroing in on short list for new coach
- New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy calls on Sen. Robert Menendez to resign in wake of indictment
- Indonesian woman sentenced to prison for blasphemy after saying Muslim prayer then eating pork on TikTok
- Blake Snell free agent rumors: Best fits for two-time Cy Young winner
- Ohio State moves up as top five gets shuffled in latest US LBM Coaches Poll
- WEOWNCOIN: The Security of Cryptocurrency and Digital Identity Verification
- Hollywood writers reach a tentative deal with studios after nearly five month strike
- John Krasinski Revealed as People's Sexiest Man Alive 2024
- Kidnapped teen rescued from Southern California motel room after 4 days of being held hostage
Ranking
- 24 more monkeys that escaped from a South Carolina lab are recovered unharmed
- 1st and Relationship Goals: Inside the Love Lives of NFL Quarterbacks
- Lizzo tearfully accepts humanitarian award after lawsuits against her: 'I needed this'
- The Halloween Spirit: How the retailer shows up each fall in vacant storefronts nationwide
- Best fits for Corbin Burnes: 6 teams that could match up with Cy Young winner
- On the run for decades, convicted Mafia boss Messina Denaro dies in hospital months after capture
- Jury selection set to open in terrorism trial of extended family stemming from 2018 New Mexico raid
- McDonald's faces another 'hot coffee' lawsuit. Severely burned woman sues over negligence
Recommendation
-
DWTS' Gleb Savchenko Shares Why He Ended Brooks Nader Romance Through Text Message
-
He spoke no English, had no lawyer. An Afghan man’s case offers a glimpse into US immigration court
-
Tropical Storm Ophelia remains may cause more flooding. See its Atlantic coast aftermath.
-
Russell Brand faces another sexual misconduct allegation as woman claims he exposed himself at BBC studio
-
Mason Bates’ Met-bound opera ‘Kavalier & Clay’ based on Michael Chabon novel premieres in Indiana
-
Philippines vows to remove floating barrier placed by China’s coast guard at a disputed lagoon
-
Why the US job market has defied rising interest rates and expectations of high unemployment
-
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy calls on Sen. Robert Menendez to resign in wake of indictment