Current:Home > MarketsEnbridge Now Expects $55 Million Fine for Michigan Oil Spill-LoTradeCoin
Enbridge Now Expects $55 Million Fine for Michigan Oil Spill
View Date:2024-12-23 23:52:16
The potential fine Enbridge, Inc. expects for spilling more than 1 million gallons of tar sands oil into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River in 2010 continues to creep higher and now is estimated at $55 million.
The Canada-based company revealed the revised estimate earlier this week in a quarterly disclosure filing with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It cautions investors that the ultimate fine eventually imposed by the federal Environmental Protection Agency could cost the company even more.
The new figure offers a glimpse of the highly secretive and lengthy negotiations between Enbridge and the EPA and lawyers from the U.S. Department of Justice. In 2013, Enbridge estimated the fine would be $22 million. That figure jumped to $40 million last year. Those shifting numbers signal a resolution may be near, industry analysts say.
The penalty is for Clean Water Act violations surrounding the tar sands oil spill that fouled nearly 40 miles of the Kalamazoo River near Marshall, Mich. after its aging pipeline 6B ruptured nearly six years ago.
The spill triggered a massive cleanup effort that has cost the company more than $1.2 billion.
Before being asked by the EPA not to discuss the negotiations publically, Enbridge spokesman Michael Barnes said the EPA opened discussions last year with a proposed $85 million fine. That led to Enbridge to propose a $40 million fine and the EPA countered with $65 million, Barnes said.
But now, Barnes said he can no longer talk about the settlement discussions at the request of the EPA.
“We continue to meet with the DOJ and EPA to discuss possible settlement parameters,” he said. “The DOJ/EPA has bound us to confidentiality on the discussions.”
The EPA did not respond to requests for comment.
The $55 million figure represents the minimum fine the company expects, according to its SEC filing.
“Given the complexity of settlement negotiations, which we expect will continue, and the limited information available to assess the matter, we are unable to reasonably estimate the final penalty which might be incurred or to reasonably estimate a range of outcomes at this time,” the company said in the filing.
Enbridge also noted that the EPA could require it to institute programs such as enhanced monitoring of its pipelines that could add to its costs.
Andy Levine, a former EPA lawyer now in private practice in Philadelphia, said the disclosure of the $55 million figure indicates a settlement is near.
“This has been going on for some time now. So when you see the numbers getting closer and some movement by both sides, it tells me that a resolution is close at hand,” he said.
“This is not something that either side wants to go on forever.”
Enbridge and the EPA have twice agreed to extend the deadline for reaching a settlement.
“There comes a time when it has to be done so both parties can move on,” Levin said. “I think that’s what you’re seeing here. There have been two time extensions and the numbers are getting closer.”
Levin also said he believes Enbridge and the EPA want to avoid a lengthy and costly court battle.
“I’m not seeing a stalemate here,” he said. “It appears they want to keep this out of court.”
Enbridge already has been hit with millions in penalties. The company agreed to a $75 million fine from Michigan environmental officials and a $4 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division in 2014. The company also was tagged with a $3.7 million civil penalty by the U.S. Department of Transportation four years ago.
veryGood! (59)
Related
- Britney Spears Reunites With Son Jayden Federline After His Move to Hawaii
- Inside Clean Energy: For Offshore Wind Energy, Bigger is Much Cheaper
- Netflix’s Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo Movie Reveals Fiery New Details
- New Study Says World Must Cut Short-Lived Climate Pollutants as Well as Carbon Dioxide to Meet Paris Agreement Goals
- Who's hosting 'SNL' tonight? Musical guest, start time, where to watch Nov. 9 episode
- The Year in Climate Photos
- Pull Up a Seat for Jennifer Lawrence's Chicken Shop Date With Amelia Dimoldenberg
- Well, It's Still Pride Is Reason Enough To Buy These 25 Rainbow Things
- Sister Wives’ Christine Brown Shares Glimpse Into Honeymoon One Year After Marrying David Woolley
- Cynthia Nixon Weighs In On Chances of Kim Cattrall Returning for More And Just Like That Episodes
Ranking
- Jeep slashes 2025 Grand Cherokee prices
- Inside Clean Energy: Batteries Got Cheaper in 2021. So How Close Are We to EVs That Cost Less than Gasoline Vehicles?
- First Republic Bank shares plummet, reigniting fears about U.S. banking sector
- Warmer Nights Caused by Climate Change Take a Toll on Sleep
- Disruptions to Amtrak service continue after fire near tracks in New York City
- Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian Is Officially Hitting the Road as a Barker
- Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian Is Officially Hitting the Road as a Barker
- Who bears the burden, and how much, when religious employees refuse Sabbath work?
Recommendation
-
'Full House' star Dave Coulier diagnosed with stage 3 cancer
-
Love Island’s Ekin-Su Cülcüloğlu and Davide Sanclimenti Break Up
-
The U.K. blocks Microsoft's $69 billion deal to buy game giant Activision Blizzard
-
San Francisco is repealing its boycott of anti-LGBT states
-
Sister Wives’ Meri Brown Shares Hysterical Farmers Only Dating Profile Video After Kody Split
-
Inside Clean Energy: For Offshore Wind Energy, Bigger is Much Cheaper
-
‘Delay is Death,’ said UN Chief António Guterres of the New IPCC Report Showing Climate Impacts Are Outpacing Adaptation Efforts
-
Expansion of a Lucrative Dairy Digester Market is Sowing Environmental Worries in the U.S.