Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies-LoTradeCoin
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View Date:2024-12-24 00:18:33
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (7568)
Related
- Advocacy group sues Tennessee over racial requirements for medical boards
- Biden administration goes bigger on funding apprenticeships, hoping to draw contrast with GOP
- Gunman fires into crowd in Boston neighborhood, injuring 5 people
- Horoscopes Today, July 10, 2024
- Princess Kate makes rare public appearance after completing cancer chemo
- What Iran's moderate new President Masoud Pezeshkian might try to change — and what he definitely won't
- AP PHOTOS: Scenes from Alec Baldwin’s ‘Rust’ shooting trial
- The Aspark Owl Hypercar just destroyed the Rimac Nevera's top speed record. Is it the fastest EV ever?
- Kentucky governor says investigators will determine what caused deadly Louisville factory explosion
- Hurricane Beryl’s remnants flood Vermont a year after the state was hit by catastrophic rainfall
Ranking
- Kim Kardashian and Kourtney Kardashian Team Up for SKIMS Collab With Dolce & Gabbana After Feud
- Sophia Bush Shares Insight Into “Priceless” Friendship With One Tree Hill Costar Hilarie Burton
- Texas deputy fatally shot during search for suspect in assault on pizzeria clerk
- Brittany Mahomes Gives Patrick Mahomes a Hair Makeover
- NY forest ranger dies fighting fires as air quality warnings are issued in New York and New Jersey
- George Clooney urges Biden to drop out of the 2024 race: The dam has broken
- The Daily Money: Can you afford to retire?
- Tennessee Army vet charged with murder, assault in attacks on 2 unhoused men
Recommendation
-
Jana Kramer’s Ex Mike Caussin Shares Resentment Over Her Child Support Payments
-
Some smaller news outlets in swing states can’t afford election coverage. AP is helping them
-
Sale of US Steel kicks up a political storm, but Pittsburgh isn’t Steeltown USA anymore
-
Elephants trample tourist to death after he left fiancée in car to take photos in South Africa
-
What is best start in NBA history? Five teams ahead of Cavaliers' 13-0 record
-
Man detained after BBC commentator's wife, 2 daughters killed in crossbow attack in U.K.
-
NATO nations agree Ukraine is on irreversible path to membership
-
Stock market today: Asian shares zoom higher, with Nikkei over 42,000 after Wall St sets new records