Current:Home > InvestJudge Upholds $14 Million Fine in Long-running Citizen Suit Against Exxon in Texas-LoTradeCoin
Judge Upholds $14 Million Fine in Long-running Citizen Suit Against Exxon in Texas
View Date:2024-12-23 19:58:12
A federal judge this week rejected a third appeal by ExxonMobil in the 12-year legal battle over toxic emissions from one of the Texas-based energy giant’s Gulf Coast facilities.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a $14.25 million fine—thought to be the largest-ever fine resulting from citizen enforcement of environmental law—in a lawsuit brought by environmental organizations against Exxon’s massive complex in Baytown, some 25 miles outside Houston.
The decision still doesn’t guarantee a conclusion to the long-running case, which Exxon may be able to appeal further.
“It’s frequently in the interest of a company to drag out cases for as long as possible to try and get the other side to give up, but we are not giving up,” said Josh Kratka, senior attorney at the National Environmental Law Center, which represented the plaintiffs in the trial. “We hope this is the end of it.”
The suit was first filed in 2010 by Environment Texas and the Sierra Club under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act, which empowers civilians to sue polluters for violations of federal environmental law.
The plaintiffs originally alleged that 16,386 illegal air emissions events, which Exxon disclosed in its own reports, affected the health of communities around the Baytown refinery. A district court in 2017 ordered the Texas-based energy giant to pay almost $20 million.
Exxon appealed, arguing that not all of those violations could be directly traced to specific health problems. Upon review, the court reduced the number of actionable violations to 3,651 and reduced the fine to $14.25 million. Exxon appealed again, contesting the court’s legal standing and the size of the fine.
“This is a standard tactic. It just goes to show the lengths that polluters will go to to prevent true justice from coming forward,” said Stefania Tomaskovic, director of the Coalition for Environment, Equity and Resilience in Houston. “It’s always a struggle to protect our air when companies have so much money to hire lawyers and citizens are not as well resourced.”
On Tuesday, a federal judge rejected Exxon’s latest appeals. The judge upheld the high fine in part due to elements of the Clean Air Act designed to ensure that paying emissions fines isn’t a cheaper alternative for polluters than building adequate facilities.
“The company delayed implementation of four emission-reducing projects mandated by a 2012 agreement between Exxon and state regulators,” said the court opinion issued this week. “Exxon needed to invest $11.75 million dollars in improvements to comply with its Clean Air Act obligations.”
Founded in 1919, Exxon’s Baytown refinery has the fourth largest production levels in the U.S. and is the second largest Exxon refinery in the world (after the company’s Singapore facility).
Exxon calls its Baytown campus the “largest integrated petrochemical complex in the U.S.” and “one of the most technologically advanced petroleum and petrochemical complexes in the world.” It includes a refinery, two chemical plants, an engineering office and a technology center.
The facility was the site of a major explosion and fire in late December 2021, prompting another lawsuit from local community members.
Exxon did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.
“Exxon’s Baytown complex is the largest polluter on the Houston Ship Channel,” said Neil Carman, clear air program director for the Lone Star chapter of the Sierra Club, a plaintiff in the case. “Exxon still needs to do more to create cleaner air in the Houston area.”
veryGood! (3741)
Related
- Nicole Scherzinger receives support from 'The View' hosts after election post controversy
- Florida woman who shot Black neighbor through door won't face murder charge
- Raven-Symoné Reveals Why She's Had Romantic Partners Sign NDAs
- The Newest Threat to a Warming Alaskan Arctic: Beavers
- Pete Alonso's best free agent fits: Will Mets bring back Polar Bear?
- Court dismisses Ivanka Trump from New York attorney general's fraud lawsuit
- Man charged with murder in stabbings of 3 elderly people in Boston-area home
- Navajo Nation Approves First Tribal ‘Green Jobs’ Legislation
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, 4G
- Launched to great fanfare a few years ago, Lordstown Motors is already bankrupt
Ranking
- Queen Elizabeth II's Final 5-Word Diary Entry Revealed
- Developing Countries Weather Global Warming, Cold Shoulders
- Delaware State Sen. Sarah McBride launches bid to become first openly trans member of Congress
- Climate Policies Could Boost Economic Growth by 5%, OECD Says
- Mississippi woman pleads guilty to stealing Social Security funds
- Trump heard in audio clip describing highly confidential, secret documents
- Small businesses got more than $200 billion in potentially fraudulent COVID loans, report finds
- Perry Touts ‘24-7’ Power, Oil Pipelines as Key to Energy Security
Recommendation
-
As US Catholic bishops meet, Trump looms over their work on abortion and immigration
-
Armie Hammer Not Charged With Sexual Assault After LAPD Investigation
-
Rachel Hollis Reflects on Unbelievably Intense 4 Months After Ex-Husband Dave Hollis' Death
-
Four men arrested in 2022 Texas smuggling deaths of 53 migrants
-
Patricia Heaton criticizes media, 'extremists' she says 'fear-mongered' in 2024 election
-
Dancing with the Stars Pros Daniella Karagach and Pasha Pashkov Welcome First Baby
-
Kim Kardashian Teases Potential New Romance With Fred in Kardashians Teaser
-
Dangers of Climate Change: Lack of Water Can Lead to War