Current:Home > MarketsCourt blocks Mississippi ban on voting after some crimes, but GOP official will appeal ruling-LoTradeCoin
Court blocks Mississippi ban on voting after some crimes, but GOP official will appeal ruling
View Date:2024-12-23 20:43:46
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Mississippi is violating the U.S. Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment by permanently stripping voting rights from people convicted of some felonies, a federal appeals court panel ruled in a split decision Friday.
Two judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ordered the Mississippi secretary of state to stop enforcing a provision in the state constitution that disenfranchises people convicted of specific crimes, including murder, forgery and bigamy.
If the ruling stands, thousands of people could regain voting rights, possibly in time for the Nov. 7 general election for governor and other statewide offices.
Mississippi Republican Attorney General Lynn Fitch expects to ask the full appeals court to reconsider the panel’s 2-1 ruling, her spokesperson, Debbee Hancock, said Friday.
The 5th Circuit is one of the most conservative appeals courts in the U.S., and in 2022 it declined to overturn Mississippi’s felony disenfranchisement provisions — a ruling that came in a separate lawsuit. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would not consider that case, allowing the 2022 appeals court ruling to stand.
The two lawsuits use different arguments.
The suit that the Supreme Court declined to hear was based on arguments about equal protection. Plaintiffs said that the Jim Crow-era authors of the Mississippi Constitution stripped voting rights for crimes they thought Black people were more likely to commit, including forgery, larceny and bigamy.
The lawsuit that the appeals court panel ruled on Friday is based on arguments that Mississippi is imposing cruel and unusual punishment with a lifetime ban on voting after some felony convictions.
“Mississippi stands as an outlier among its sister states, bucking a clear and consistent trend in our Nation against permanent disenfranchisement,” wrote Judges Carolyn Dineen King and James L. Dennis.
Under the Mississippi Constitution, people convicted of 10 specific felonies — including murder, forgery and bigamy — lose the right to vote. The state’s attorney general expanded the list to 22 crimes, including timber larceny and carjacking.
To have their voting rights restored, people convicted of any of the crimes must get a pardon from the governor or persuade lawmakers to pass individual bills just for them with two-thirds approval. Lawmakers in recent years have passed few of those bills, and they passed none this year.
In the ruling Friday, the two judges in favor of restoring voting rights — King and Dennis — were nominated by Democratic presidents and the one who disagreed — Judge Edith H. Jones — was nominated by a Republican president.
In her dissent, Jones wrote that when the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause does not bar states from permanently disenfranchising felons, justices said people should seek change through state legislatures.
“Today, the court turns that advice on its head,” Jones wrote. “No need to change the law through a laborious political process. The court will do it for you, so long as you rely on the Due Process Clause, rather than the Equal Protection Clause.”
A coalition of disparate groups supports reinstating voting rights to felons, including the libertarian Cato Institute, the American Probation and Parole Association, and the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mississippi branch of the NAACP.
veryGood! (76482)
Related
- Keke Palmer Says Ryan Murphy “Ripped” Into Her Over Scream Queens Schedule
- HarperCollins and striking union reach tentative agreement
- Dawn Goodwin and 300 Environmental Groups Consider the new Line 3 Pipeline a Danger to All Forms of Life
- Shopify deleted 322,000 hours of meetings. Should the rest of us be jealous?
- 'Joker 2' actor pans DC sequel as the 'worst film' ever: 'It has no plot'
- And Just Like That's David Eigenberg Reveals Most Surprising Supporter of Justice for Steve
- Why Cynthia Nixon Doesn’t Want Fans to Get Their Hopes Up About Kim Cattrall in And Just Like That
- Biden Could Reduce the Nation’s Production of Oil and Gas, but Probably Not as Much as Many Hope
- See Megan Fox, Machine Gun Kelly, Brian Austin Green and Sharna Burgess' Blended Family Photos
- High-paying jobs that don't need a college degree? Thousands of them sit empty
Ranking
- Can I take on 2 separate jobs in the same company? Ask HR
- Missing Titanic Submersible Passes Oxygen Deadline Amid Massive Search
- An Offshore Wind Farm on Lake Erie Moves Closer to Reality, but Will It Ever Be Built?
- Adidas is looking to repurpose unsold Yeezy products. Here are some of its options
- Officer injured at Ferguson protest shows improvement, transferred to rehab
- For the Second Time in Four Years, the Ninth Circuit Has Ordered the EPA to Set New Lead Paint and Dust Standards
- HarperCollins and striking union reach tentative agreement
- Conservative Justices Express Some Support for Limiting Biden’s Ability to Curtail Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Recommendation
-
Two 'incredibly rare' sea serpents seen in Southern California waters months apart
-
Nordstrom Rack Currently Has Limited-Time Under $50 Deals on Hundreds of Bestselling Dresses
-
As the US Rushes After the Minerals for the Energy Transition, a 150-Year-Old Law Allows Mining Companies Free Rein on Public Lands
-
The social cost of carbon: a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
-
How Ben Affleck Really Feels About His and Jennifer Lopez’s Movie Gigli Today
-
Noxious Neighbors: The EPA Knows Tanks Holding Heavy Fuels Emit Harmful Chemicals. Why Are Americans Still at Risk?
-
An activist group is spreading misinformation to stop solar projects in rural America
-
New York and New England Need More Clean Energy. Is Hydropower From Canada the Best Way to Get it?