Current:Home > Contact-usFormer Wisconsin Supreme Court justice fights order to appear in court over impeachment advice-LoTradeCoin
Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice fights order to appear in court over impeachment advice
View Date:2024-12-24 00:50:13
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice is fighting a subpoena ordering her to appear in court in a lawsuit related to advice she gave about possible impeachment of a current liberal justice, calling it “unreasonable and oppressive.”
Republican lawmakers have threatened possible impeachment of current Justice Janet Protasiewicz related to comments she made during the campaign calling GOP-drawn legislative maps “rigged” and “unfair.” She joined with the liberal majority of the court in agreeing to hear a lawsuit supported by Democrats that seeks to overturn the GOP maps and enact new ones.
Wisconsin Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos asked three former conservative Supreme Court justices for advice on impeachment. Two of the three told him that impeaching Protasiewicz was not warranted. The third, former Chief Justice Patience Roggensack, has not said what her advice was and Vos has repeatedly refused to disclose it.
The liberal watchdog group American Oversight filed a lawsuit alleging that the three former justices researching impeachment for Vos had violated both the state open meetings and open records laws. American Oversight wants the judge to order the former justices to meet in public and to release records related to their work. It was also seeking attorneys fees.
Last week, Roggensack received a subpoena compelling her to attend a hearing in the case was scheduled for this Thursday. On Monday, she asked to be released from the subpoena.
“I believe it would be unreasonable and oppressive to require me to appear at a hearing on a motion for preliminary injunction and even for the Court to consider such a motion,” Roggensack wrote.
The judge scheduled another hearing for Wednesday afternoon, likely to address Roggensack’s request.
Roggensack, in her affidavit with the court, said the order being sought, which included requiring the former justices to meet in public, would impair her First Amendment rights of freedom of expression, peaceably assembling and petitioning the government.
Roggensack said that Vos, the Republican legislator, asked for her advice on impeachment. Roggensack said she told him she had been researching the issue on her own “because I found the topic to be interesting and because I had not previously considered the standards for impeachment of a Supreme Court justice.”
Roggensack said she never considered Vos’s request to mean she was becoming part of a governmental body or committee as American Oversight alleged in its lawsuit.
Vos himself called the effort a panel when he announced in September that he was seeking their advice.
Roggensack said she had a lunch with the other two former justices, David Prosser and Jon Wilcox, along with Vos’s attorney. Prosser and Wilcox have also said that was the only meeting the three former justices had. They all said that they separately advised Vos and did not collaborate on their advice.
American Oversight filed open records requests with the former justices. Prosser released the email he sent Vos that included his impeachment advice, as well as voicemail messages from Roggensack and text messages they exchanged.
Neither Wilcox, Roggensack, nor Vos’ office have responded to its requests for records, American Oversight said.
Vos originally said he was considering impeachment if Protasiewicz did not recuse herself from the redistricting case. She didn’t recuse. Vos didn’t move to impeach her, following the advice against impeachment from the former justices. But now he’s suggesting he may attempt to impeach her if she does not rule in favor of upholding the current Republican maps.
The Wisconsin Constitution reserves impeachment for “corrupt conduct in office, or for crimes and misdemeanors.”
veryGood! (9399)
Related
- Burt Bacharach, composer of classic songs, will have papers donated to Library of Congress
- What we know about the shooting of an Uber driver in Ohio and the scam surrounding it
- ‘Civil War’ continues box-office campaign at No. 1
- 'Do I get floor seats?' College coaches pass on athletes because of parents' behavior
- South Carolina does not set a date for the next execution after requests for a holiday pause
- The Supreme Court will decide whether Trump is immune from federal prosecution. Here’s what’s next
- North Carolina medical marijuana sales begin at Cherokee store
- New Hampshire man convicted of killing daughter, 5, ordered to be at sentencing after skipping trial
- Stock market today: Asian stocks decline as China stimulus plan disappoints markets
- Kenya defense chief among 10 officers killed in military helicopter crash; 2 survive
Ranking
- RHOBH's Erika Jayne Reveals Which Team She's on Amid Kyle Richards, Dorit Kemsley Feud
- Tennessee Gov. Lee admits defeat in school voucher push
- Kevin Bacon dances back to ‘Footloose’ high school
- Opening a Qschaincoin Account
- Review: 'Emilia Pérez' is the most wildly original film you'll see in 2024
- Horoscopes Today, April 21, 2024
- What fruits are in season right now? Find these spring picks at a farmer's market near you
- Biden leans on young voters to flip North Carolina
Recommendation
-
Congress heard more testimony about UFOs: Here are the biggest revelations
-
Bachelor Nation's Greg Grippo and Victoria Fuller Break Up After One Year of Dating
-
Yoko Ono to receive Edward MacDowell Medal for lifetime achievement
-
'Child care desert': In this state, parents pay one-third of their income on child care
-
Ben Affleck and His Son Samuel, 12, Enjoy a Rare Night Out Together
-
Once a fringe Indian ideology, Hindu nationalism is now mainstream, thanks to Modi’s decade in power
-
After a 7-year-old Alabama girl lost her mother, she started a lemonade stand to raise money for her headstone
-
An explosion razes a home in Maryland, sending 1 person to the hospital