Current:Home > NewsIowa leaders want its halted abortion law to go into effect. The state’s high court will rule Friday-LoTradeCoin
Iowa leaders want its halted abortion law to go into effect. The state’s high court will rule Friday
View Date:2024-12-23 20:27:36
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — The Iowa Supreme Court is expected to weigh in Friday on the state’s temporarily blocked abortion law, which prohibits abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy and before many women know they are pregnant.
With the law on hold, abortion is legal in Iowa up to 20 weeks of pregnancy. On Friday, the justices could uphold or reject a lower court ruling that temporarily blocked enforcement of the law, with or without offering comments on whether the law itself is constitutional. Both supporters of the law and the abortion providers opposed to it were preparing for the various possibilities.
The high court’s highly anticipated ruling will be the latest in an already yearslong legal battle over abortion restrictions in the state that escalated when the Iowa Supreme Court and then the U.S. Supreme Court both overturned decisions establishing a constitutional right to abortion.
Most Republican-led states across the country have limited abortion access since 2022, when Roe v. Wade was overturned. Currently, 14 states have near-total bans at all stages of pregnancy, and three ban abortions at about six weeks.
The Iowa law passed with exclusively Republican support in a one-day special session last July. A legal challenge was filed the next day by the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa, Planned Parenthood North Central States and the Emma Goldman Clinic.
The law was in effect for a few days before a district court judge put it on pause, a decision Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds appealed.
Iowa’s high court has not yet resolved whether earlier rulings that applied an “undue burden test” for abortion laws should remain in effect. The undue burden test is an intermediate level of analysis that questions whether laws create too significant an obstacle to abortion.
The state argued the law should be analyzed using rational basis review, the least strict approach to judging legal challenges, and the court should simply weigh whether the government has a legitimate interest in restricting the procedure.
Representing the state during oral arguments in April, attorney Eric Wessan said that the bench already indicated what’s appropriate in this case when they ruled that there’s no “fundamental right” to abortion in the state constitution.
“This court has never before recognized a quasi-fundamental or a fundamental-ish right,” he said.
But Peter Im, an attorney for Planned Parenthood, told the justices there are core constitutional rights at stake that merit the court’s consideration of whether there is too heavy a burden on people seeking abortion access.
“It is emphatically this court’s role and duty to say how the Iowa Constitution protects individual rights, how it protects bodily autonomy, how it protects Iowans’ rights to exercise dominion over their own bodies,” he said.
veryGood! (8322)
Related
- Trump on Day 1: Begin deportation push, pardon Jan. 6 rioters and make his criminal cases vanish
- Prince Harry Returning to U.K. to Visit Dad King Charles III Amid Cancer Diagnosis
- Bob Saget's widow, Kelly Rizzo, dating Breckin Meyer two years after husband's death
- Megan Fox's Metal Naked Dress at the 2024 Grammys Is Her Riskiest Yet
- Anti-abortion advocates press Trump for more restrictions as abortion pill sales spike
- Kelly Rizzo Dating Breckin Meyer 2 Years After Husband Bob Saget’s Death
- You can order a test to find out your biological age. Is it worth it?
- Andre Agassi, Steffi Graf defeat John McEnroe, Maria Sharapova in Pickleball Slam 2
- This is Your Sign To Share this Luxury Gift Guide With Your Partner *Hint* *Hint
- Victoria Monét wins best new artist at the Grammys
Ranking
- Kentucky woman seeking abortion files lawsuit over state bans
- House plans vote on standalone Israel aid bill next week, Speaker Johnson says
- Mega Millions jackpot climbs to $333 million for Feb. 2 drawing. See the winning numbers
- Jay-Z calls out Grammys for snubbing Beyoncé in acceptance speech: We want y'all to get it right
- Two 'incredibly rare' sea serpents seen in Southern California waters months apart
- Jay-Z Calls Out Grammy Awards for Snubbing Beyoncé
- Who will run the US House in 2025? Once again, control could tip on California swing districts
- Apple Vision Pro makes triumphant appearance courtside on Celtics fan's face
Recommendation
-
US Diplomats Notch a Win on Climate Super Pollutants With Help From the Private Sector
-
Paris Jackson covers up over 80 tattoos at the Grammys: 'In love with my alter ego'
-
Colorado Springs school district plans teacher housing on district property
-
Bob Saget's widow, Kelly Rizzo, dating Breckin Meyer two years after husband's death
-
Spurs coach Gregg Popovich had a stroke earlier this month, is expected to make full recovery
-
Second atmospheric river in days churns through California, knocking out power and flooding roads
-
Celine Dion's surprise Grammys appearance gets standing ovation amid health battle
-
World Cup 2026 schedule announced: Azteca hosts opener, MetLife Stadium hosts final