Current:Home > ScamsNew Tar Sands Oil Pipeline Isn’t Worth the Risks, Minnesota Officials Say-LoTradeCoin
New Tar Sands Oil Pipeline Isn’t Worth the Risks, Minnesota Officials Say
View Date:2024-12-23 23:57:10
The Minnesota Department of Commerce recommended this week that a major tar sands oil pipeline should not be expanded and that the old, existing line should be shut down. Its reason: the state’s refineries don’t need additional crude oil, so there’s no point in taking on extra risks.
The recommendation is the latest sign of opposition to fossil fuel pipelines at the state level, just as the federal government is strongly supporting them.
The Minnesota Department of Commerce’s report, submitted to state regulators who will eventually decide whether or not to approve the pipeline, cites a consulting firm that determined Minnesota’s refineries are already running at peak capacity and that there’s no sign of a long-term increase in local demand for fuel.
The analysis concludes that the proposed Enbridge Line 3 pipeline project, from Hardisty, in Alberta, Canada, to Superior, Wisconsin, isn’t worth the risks.
“In light of the serious risks and effects on the natural and socioeconomic environments of the existing Line 3 and the limited benefit that the existing Line 3 provides to Minnesota refineries, it is reasonable to conclude that Minnesota would be better off if Enbridge proposed to cease operations of the existing Line 3, without any new pipeline being built,” the department states.
Environmental advocates said that the line might still be approved, despite the report’s conclusions.
Enbridge disagreed with the department’s findings. “This is critical infrastructure, which is being replaced with the most advanced materials, most up to date technology and under superior construction methods,” Enbridge spokesperson Michael Barnes said. “After months of analysis and public input, the state’s own Final Environmental Impact Statement concluded that, from an environmental perspective, the replacement is superior to maintaining the existing line.”
Other States Pushing Back on Pipelines
The report comes as a number of new and existing oil and gas pipelines are being challenged or blocked by states because of market forces, strong public opposition and governments’ environmental concerns.
In April 2016, New York state regulators denied a water permit for the Constitution pipeline, a 125-mile natural gas pipeline that would have shipped natural gas from hydraulic fracturing operations in Pennsylvania into New York.
The following month, Georgia passed a moratorium on pipeline companies’ ability to seize property owners’ land through eminent domain, effectively halting the Palmetto pipeline, a gasoline and diesel pipeline.
Earlier this year, New York state stopped two other natural gas pipelines over water quality concerns. Just last week, West Virginia officials announced that they will re-evaluate a water permit that they had previously approved for the Mountain Valley pipeline, a major natural gas pipeline.
In Michigan, Republicans are voicing strong opposition to the continued use of an aging crude oil pipeline also owned by Enbridge. State Attorney General Bill Schuette, who is running for governor, called in June for the shutdown of Line 5, a 64-year-old pipeline, where it crosses under the Great Lakes.
On Monday, Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Energy Subcommittee, sent a letter to Enbridge President and CEO Al Monaco. Upton wrote that he was “deeply concerned” to hear about recent damage to the pipeline’s protective coating likely resulting from human error and urged Monaco to “conduct repairs immediately.”
Absent federal leadership, state officials are now taking it upon themselves to challenge pipeline projects.
“The federal government has too frequently capitulated or rubber-stamped these projects,” Greg Cunningham of the Conservation Law Foundation said. “What we are seeing now is a groundswell within states where, for a number of different justifications, states are standing up to these pipelines.”
Advocates Turn Focus from National to Local
One reason may be that pipeline opponents are increasingly focusing their efforts on state regulatory agencies, given the strong federal support for fossil fuels under the Trump administration.
“Since President Trump took office, and the [administration’s] blatant disregard for property rights and the belief of climate change, a lot of us have put all of our focus on local [agencies], knowing that the federal track is really not an option for us,” Bold Alliance President Jane Kleeb said.
One place Kleeb’s group has focused its pipeline opposition efforts is on the Nebraska Public Service Commission, which is currently reviewing a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline project. If built, the pipeline would pump tar sands crude oil from Canada to Nebraska, and then on to refineries elsewhere. The Commission, facing a backlash from landowners, is expected to issue a ruling on the proposed project by the end of November.
States See New Responsibility for Water, Climate
Greater environmental action is also coming from the states themselves in reaction to lax federal regulations.
“Some states are already reacting to what’s happened post-election with a renewed sense that the burden of protecting their water, of dealing with climate change, of trying to transition to cleaner energy sources falls on them,” Pat Parenteau, a professor at Vermont Law School, said.
What happens next in West Virginia, where state regulators are currently re-evaluating a water permit, will be a key indicator of how far state pushback against pipeline projects will go, Parenteau said.
“If West Virginia were to deny a water quality certification for that pipeline, I think that would be a very interesting signal,” he said. “You just wouldn’t think of West Virginia as opposing any energy development.”
Don’t Count Enbridge Out
The Minnesota Department of Commerce report on Enbridge’s Line 3—a pipeline that has drawn protests from Native American tribes and environmental advocates—isn’t necessarily a death knell for the project.
A prior analysis by Minnesota officials for Line 67, a different Enbridge pipeline, reached similarly negative conclusions, but the company addressed the concerns, and the project was ultimately built.
“It provides great fodder for those opposed to the pipeline to really highlight why it is not a good project for the state,” Josh Axelrod, a policy analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council, said. But, it could also be used by the company to identify weaknesses in their current plan and revise their proposal for ultimate approval, he said.
veryGood! (3495)
Related
- Supreme Court seems likely to allow class action to proceed against tech company Nvidia
- Illinois man sentenced to life in prison for his role in 2020 killings of his uncle, 2 others
- Seine water still isn't safe for swimmers, frustrating U.S. Olympians
- Man admits kidnapping Michigan store manager in scheme to steal 123 guns
- Justice Department says jail conditions in Georgia’s Fulton County violate detainee rights
- Woman fatally mauled by 2 dogs in Tennessee neighborhood; police shoot 1 dog
- Northern California wildfire spreads, with more hot weather expected. Thousands evacuate
- Top White House aide urges staff to tune out ‘noise’ and focus on governing during debate fallout
- Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul VIP fight package costs a whopping $2M. Here's who bought it.
- Southwest Air adopts ‘poison pill’ as activist investor Elliott takes significant stake in company
Ranking
- Massachusetts lawmakers to consider a soccer stadium for the New England Revolution
- Delta flight diverts to New York after passengers are served spoiled food
- Meet the diehard tennis fans camped out in Wimbledon's epic queue
- Bond increased to $1M for Texas woman accused in attempted drowning seen as possible hate crime
- What does the top five look like and other questions facing the College Football Playoff committee
- Stock market today: Asian shares mostly rise, boosted by Wall Street records as Tesla zooms
- An Ohio apartment building, evacuated after a deadly explosion nearby, could reopen soon
- Wisconsin Supreme Court to consider whether 175-year-old law bans abortion
Recommendation
-
My Little Pony finally hits the Toy Hall of Fame, alongside Phase 10 and Transformers
-
Yes, petroleum jelly has many proven benefits. Here's what it's for.
-
Two 13-year-olds killed, 12-year-old injured in Atlanta shooting
-
Tesla sales fall for second straight quarter despite price cuts, but decline not as bad as expected
-
Some women are stockpiling Plan B and abortion pills. Here's what experts have to say.
-
Bond increased to $1M for Texas woman accused in attempted drowning seen as possible hate crime
-
Why Olivia Culpo Didn't Let Sister Aurora Bring her Boyfriend to Christian McCaffrey Wedding
-
FBI investigates vandalism at two Jewish cemeteries in Cincinnati