Current:Home > Contact-usSupreme Court makes it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, charge Trump faces-LoTradeCoin
Supreme Court makes it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, charge Trump faces
View Date:2024-12-23 19:29:16
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday made it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, a charge that also has been brought against former President Donald Trump.
The justices ruled 6-3 that the charge of obstructing an official proceeding, enacted in 2002 in response to the financial scandal that brought down Enron Corp., must include proof that defendants tried to tamper with or destroy documents. Only some of the people who violently attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, fall into that category.
The decision could be used as fodder for claims by Trump and his Republican allies that the Justice Department has treated the Capitol riot defendants unfairly.
It’s unclear how the court’s decision will affect the case against Trump in Washington, although special counsel Jack Smith has said the charges faced by the former president would not be affected.
The high court returned the case of former Pennsylvania police officer Joseph Fischer to a lower court to determine if Fischer can be charged with obstruction. Fischer has been indicted for his role in disrupting Congress’ certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over Trump.
Fischer is among about 350 people who have been charged with obstruction. Some pleaded guilty to or were convicted of lesser charges.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court’s opinion, joined by conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas, and by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Reading the obstruction statute broadly “would also criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists to decades in prison,” Roberts wrote.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissented, along with Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.
Roughly 170 Capitol insurrection defendants have been convicted of obstructing or conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress, including the leaders of two far-right extremist groups, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers. A number of defendants have had their sentencings delayed until after the justices rule on the matter.
Some rioters have even won early release from prison while the appeal was pending over concerns that they might end up serving longer than they should have if the Supreme Court ruled against the Justice Department. They include Kevin Seefried, a Delaware man who threatened a Black police officer with a pole attached to a Confederate battle flag as he stormed the Capitol. Seefried was sentenced last year to three years behind bars, but a judge recently ordered that he be released one year into his prison term while awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Most lower court judges who have weighed in have allowed the charge to stand. Among them, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, a Trump appointee, wrote that “statutes often reach beyond the principal evil that animated them.”
But U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, another Trump appointee, dismissed the charge against Fischer and two other defendants, writing that prosecutors went too far. A divided panel of the federal appeals court in Washington reinstated the charge before the Supreme Court agreed to take up the case.
More than 1,400 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes. Approximately 1,000 of them have pleaded guilty or been convicted by a jury or a judge after a trial.
The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, which has handled Jan. 6 prosecutions, said no one who has been convicted of or charged with obstruction will be completely cleared because of the ruling. Every defendant also has other felony or misdemeanor charges, or both, prosecutors said.
For around 50 people who were convicted, obstruction was the only felony count, prosecutors said. Of those, roughly two dozen who still are serving their sentence are most likely to be affected by the ruling.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
veryGood! (9687)
Related
- MLS playoff teams set: Road to MLS Cup continues with conference semifinals
- Survivor Season 44 Crowns Its Winner
- What we know about the health risks of ultra-processed foods
- Singer Ava Max slapped on stage, days after Bebe Rexha was hit with a phone while performing
- Republican Vos reelected as Wisconsin Assembly speaker despite losing seats, fights with Trump
- N.C. Church Takes a Defiant Stand—With Solar Panels
- FDA advisers narrowly back first gene therapy for muscular dystrophy
- Lab-grown chicken meat gets green light from federal regulators
- The White Stripes drop lawsuit against Donald Trump over 'Seven Nation Army' use
- Climate Science Discoveries of the Decade: New Risks Scientists Warned About in the 2010s
Ranking
- Quincy Jones laid to rest at private family funeral in Los Angeles
- What we know about the health risks of ultra-processed foods
- Singer Ava Max slapped on stage, days after Bebe Rexha was hit with a phone while performing
- Kim Kardashian Reveals What Really Led to Sad Breakup With Pete Davidson
- Brands Our Editors Are Thankful For in 2024
- The Best Early Memorial Day Sales 2023: Kate Spade, Nordstrom Rack, J.Crew, Coach, BaubleBar, and More
- Supercomputers, Climate Models and 40 Years of the World Climate Research Programme
- Abortion bans drive off doctors and close clinics, putting other health care at risk
Recommendation
-
Trump on Day 1: Begin deportation push, pardon Jan. 6 rioters and make his criminal cases vanish
-
Tiger King star Doc Antle convicted of wildlife trafficking in Virginia
-
Survivor Season 44 Crowns Its Winner
-
Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Claims His and Ariana Madix's Relationship Was a Front
-
25 monkeys caught but more still missing after escape from research facility in SC
-
Fossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says
-
We asked, you answered: How do you feel about the end of the COVID-19 'emergency'
-
Coronavirus FAQ: 'Emergency' over! Do we unmask and grin? Or adjust our worries?