Current:Home > NewsAppeals court reduces restrictions on Biden administration contact with social media platforms-LoTradeCoin
Appeals court reduces restrictions on Biden administration contact with social media platforms
View Date:2024-12-23 19:32:52
A federal appeals court Friday significantly eased a lower court's order curbing the Biden administration's communications with social media companies over controversial content about COVID-19 and other issues.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans said Friday that the White House, the Surgeon General, the Centers for Disease Control and the FBI cannot "coerce" social media platforms to take down posts the government doesn't like.
But the court tossed out broader language in an order that a Louisiana-based federal judge had issued July 4 that effectively blocked multiple government agencies from contacting platforms like Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) to urge the removal of content.
But the appeals court's softened order won't take effect immediately. The Biden administration has 10 days to seek a review by the Supreme Court.
Friday evening's ruling came in a lawsuit filed in northeast Louisiana that accused administration officials of coercing platforms to take down content under the threat of possible antitrust actions or changes to federal law shielding them from lawsuits over their users' posts.
COVID-19 vaccines, the FBI's handling of a laptop that belonged to President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and election fraud allegations were among the topics spotlighted in the lawsuit, which accused the administration of using threats of regulatory action to squelch conservative points of view.
The states of Missouri and Louisiana filed the lawsuit, along with a conservative website owner and four people opposed to the administration's COVID-19 policy.
In a posting on X, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry called Friday's ruling "a major win against censorship."
In an unsigned 75-page opinion, three 5th Circuit judges agreed with the plaintiffs that the administration "ran afoul of the First Amendment" by at times threatening social media platforms with antitrust action or changes to law protecting them from liability.
But the court excised much of U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty's broad July 4 ruling, saying mere encouragement to take down content doesn't always cross a constitutional line.
"As an initial matter, it is axiomatic that an injunction is overbroad if it enjoins a defendant from engaging in legal conduct. Nine of the preliminary injunction's ten prohibitions risk doing just that. Moreover, many of the provisions are duplicative of each other and thus unnecessary," Friday's ruling said.
The ruling also removed some agencies from the order: the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency and the State Department.
The case was heard by judges Jennifer Walker Elrod and Edith Brown Clement, nominated to the court by former President George W. Bush; and Don Willett, nominated by former President Donald Trump. Doughty was nominated to the federal bench by Trump.
- In:
- Technology
- New Orleans
- Joe Biden
- Politics
- Louisiana
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Study finds Wisconsin voters approved a record number of school referenda
- A Call for Massive Reinvestment Aims to Reverse Coal Country’s Rapid Decline
- Wells Fargo to pay $3.7 billion settling charges it wrongfully seized homes and cars
- Pregnant Tori Bowie Tragedy: Autopsy Reveals Details on Baby's Death
- Brianna “Chickenfry” LaPaglia Explains Why She’s Not Removing Tattoo of Ex Zach Bryan’s Lyrics
- Amid blockbuster decisions on affirmative action, student loan relief and free speech, Supreme Court's term sees Roberts back on top
- Mass layoffs are being announced by companies. If these continue, will you be ready?
- California Dairy Farmers are Saving Money—and Cutting Methane Emissions—By Feeding Cows Leftovers
- Mike Williams Instagram post: Steelers' WR shades Aaron Rodgers 'red line' comments
- Two Louisiana Activists Charged with Terrorizing a Lobbyist for the Oil and Gas Industry
Ranking
- Quincy Jones' cause of death revealed: Reports
- The Biomass Industry Expands Across the South, Thanks in Part to UK Subsidies. Critics Say it’s Not ‘Carbon Neutral’
- Unsafe streets: The dangers facing pedestrians
- Environmental Groups Don’t Like North Carolina’s New Energy Law, Despite Its Emission-Cutting Goals
- Former Disney Star Skai Jackson Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Her Boyfriend
- Michael Cohen plans to call Donald Trump Jr. as a witness in trial over legal fees
- After the Fukushima disaster, Japan swore to phase out nuclear power. But not anymore
- For the Sunrise Movement’s D.C. Hub, a Call to Support the Movement for Black Lives
Recommendation
-
Bill on school bathroom use by transgender students clears Ohio Legislature, heads to governor
-
Pregnant Athlete Tori Bowie Spoke About Her Excitement to Become a Mom Before Her Death
-
In New York’s 16th Congressional District, a Progressive Challenge to the Democratic Establishment Splits Climate Groups
-
Every Time We Applauded North West's Sass
-
Todd Golden to continue as Florida basketball coach despite sexual harassment probe
-
Neil Patrick Harris Shares Amazon Father’s Day Gift Ideas Starting at $15
-
Feds sue AmerisourceBergen over 'hundreds of thousands' of alleged opioid violations
-
What Does Net Zero Emissions Mean for Big Oil? Not What You’d Think